Structured vulnerability assessment and manual penetration testing across web, mobile, network, and cloud assets, with a report your engineering team can actually act on.
Scope
- Web & mobile application testing
- Network & infrastructure testing
- Cloud configuration review
- Retest included on all critical findings
The Problem
Why this matters
Most vulnerability reports are automated scanner output with a cover page — a wall of CVSS scores and false positives with no indication of what an attacker could actually do, or what to fix first. By the time it reaches an engineering team weeks later, it's already a compliance artifact instead of a security tool, and nobody goes back to confirm the fixes actually held.
Industry Pain Points
What most teams are stuck with today
- Scanner output gets relabeled as a "penetration test," with no manual validation of what's actually exploitable
- Findings arrive as a flat severity list, with no sense of which few issues represent real business risk
- No retest included, so a fix that didn't work — or wasn't deployed — goes uncaught until the next audit
- VAPT treated as an annual compliance checkbox rather than a real test of whether current defenses hold
Methodology
How the engagement runs
Why Threat ResQ
What you're actually paying for
Manual exploitation, not scanner output
Every finding above the noise floor is hand-validated by a tester, not auto-generated by a tool nobody reviewed.
Findings your engineers can act on
Reports rank by real-world exploitability and include the specific fix, not a generic remediation category.
Retest included, not sold separately
Critical and high findings are retested as part of the engagement — you get confirmation the fix worked, not just a promise.
Compliance-mapped when you need it
Reports can be structured against PCI DSS, ISO 27001, SOC 2, DPDP, GDPR, or HIPAA when the engagement is compliance-driven.
Real Engagement Outcomes
What clients walked away with
100%
Critical findings remediated and retested before regulatory review (Adroit Finance)
On time
Regulatory review readiness achieved (Adroit Finance)
Improved
Security posture score after engagement (CPM International)
FAQ
Common questions
What's the difference between a vulnerability assessment and a penetration test?
A vulnerability assessment identifies and catalogs potential weaknesses, largely through automated scanning. A penetration test goes further — our testers manually attempt to exploit those weaknesses the way a real attacker would, to confirm what's actually exploitable versus theoretical. A VAPT engagement includes both.
What systems can you test?
Web applications, mobile apps (iOS/Android), APIs, internal and external networks, and cloud configurations (AWS, Azure, GCP). Scope is agreed with you upfront during the scoping phase.
Is retesting included?
Yes — retesting of all critical and high findings is included in the engagement, not sold as a separate add-on. We don't consider a finding closed until we've verified the fix.
Can the report be mapped to a compliance framework?
Yes — when the engagement is compliance-driven, we structure the report against the specific framework you need (PCI DSS, ISO 27001, SOC 2, DPDP, GDPR, HIPAA), so it's audit-ready rather than requiring extra translation work.
How long does a typical engagement take?
It depends on scope, but most single-application engagements run 1–3 weeks from kickoff to final report, with retesting scheduled after your team completes remediation.